Readify

Sittingbourne

The King's Curse

Sittingbourne is a town on Watling Street in Kent, between Dover and London, and a principal stop on the pilgrimage route to the Shrine of Thomas Becket at Canterbury. During the royal progress of July 1536, it became more than a place to lodge the travelling court: its road, inn, and watching townspeople framed a convergence of religious discontent, dynastic anxiety, and enforced silence. The court’s stay there brought the public consequences of royal policy into view just as Henry VIII received news of the death of his son, Henry Fitzroy.

Setting and the Royal Progress

The court was travelling towards Dover to inspect its new fortifications; after the inspection, Henry VIII and Jane Seymour were expected to go hunting. At Sittingbourne, the royal party stayed at the Lyon, whose many rooms and expansive banqueting hall could accommodate most of the court under one roof. Only the hangers-on and lower-ranking servants needed nearby inns. The arrangement made the Lyon a temporary centre of royal life, with the king’s household gathered within it and news, visitors, and local reaction converging outside its doors.

Sittingbourne’s position on Watling Street tied the progress to a route used by pilgrims travelling to Canterbury. That connection mattered in a year when the closure of smaller monasteries and nunneries had unsettled religious life across the country. The town’s setting placed the royal party not in isolation, but along a road where people could see the king pass and where the changes made in his name were felt in local communities.

A Changed Reception

The pilgrims observed the royal standard but turned their faces away from the king. They did not openly defy him; instead, their silence and refusal to offer the customary signs of welcome registered their disapproval. They feared that the closure of smaller religious houses would be followed by the destruction of larger ones. The losses described in the account were practical as well as devotional: local people had depended on abbey churches, monastic land, nunnery hospitals, and abbey kitchens, while family chantries had supported prayers for the dead. Their closure disrupted familiar forms of worship and assistance, and the transfer of religious property placed valuable buildings and materials in new hands.

The pilgrims’ response marked a break with the earlier image of Henry VIII as a young prince whose arrival promised pleasure and renewal. Their attachment to him had given way to doubt and fear. They had also heard that Jane Seymour danced on the night of Anne Boleyn’s execution and married the king eleven days after her former mistress was beheaded. Though they knew little of Jane herself, this story shaped their judgment of her. Against this muted reception, Henry’s apparent contempt for the town’s lowered heads recalled Margaret Pole’s memory of his father, Henry VII, whose expression had seemed to treat those around him as fools. The comparison links Sittingbourne’s present unease to an older history of Tudor rule without making the two kings identical.

News at the Lyon

While the court was gathered at the inn, a disturbance outside announced the arrival of a servant of Henry Fitzroy. His horse appeared to have been ridden hard, perhaps from St James’s Palace, Fitzroy’s London home. Montague noticed the commotion and, with a small nod as he entered the inn’s inner hall, prompted Margaret Pole to wait outside and learn what had happened. The servant pushed through the crowd while his groom stayed with the horse. People gathered around him, seeking news; he quietly conveyed that nothing could be done for the young man.

The message reached the court indirectly, through a tired rider and the crowd’s attempt to understand his arrival. Montague asked whether the death had been an accident, but the available answer was that its cause was not known. Behind a closed door, Henry VIII’s cry of grief broke through the inn’s restraint. Jane rose, then hesitated at the entrance to the privy chamber and stopped the guards from opening it. She could not bring herself to enter. Her uncertainty, observed by the silent court, made the king’s private bereavement a public event even before it was formally announced.

Grief, Succession, and Silence

Henry VIII interpreted the death through the language of a curse, asking why he had lost those he loved and why God had taken Fitzroy from him. He also invoked Fitzroy’s mother, Bessie Blount, as he struggled to understand the loss. Margaret Pole did not affirm the king’s explanation. Her question about whether Fitzroy had been ill instead kept the exchange close to what could be established. The episode sets the ruler’s personal grief against the political importance of his son’s death: Fitzroy’s absence sharpened the already consequential question of the succession, while the king who claimed imperial dignity was shown in a state of dependence and mourning.

After a physician attended him, the king was helped to bed by six members of his household. The scene’s contrast is pointed: Henry’s authority was expressed in the newly adopted title of Majesty, yet at the Lyon he had to be lifted and cared for by his subjects. The following morning, he ignored Margaret Pole and ate and drank heavily before returning to his chapel. The death was still not announced to the court. Messengers in Norfolk livery came and went, but the queen and her ladies received no public declaration that would tell them whether to wear mourning.

The court remained at Sittingbourne for three days. On the fourth, it continued towards Dover without announcing Fitzroy’s death, beginning mourning, or arranging his funeral. The location therefore holds a carefully suspended interval: people increasingly knew that the young duke had died, while official conduct required them to behave as if they were still waiting for him. Sittingbourne’s significance lies in this collision of visibility and silence. On its pilgrimage road, subjects made their disaffection legible by turning away; inside its inn, the court concealed a death whose dynastic consequences could not be openly addressed.